European Sociological Association
RN 15 Global, Transnational and Cosmopolitan Sociology
Mid-Term Conference
“Globalization, supranational dynamics and local experience”
15-16 April, 2016, Milan (Italy)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
One of the main
challenges that sociology and social sciences face today is to understand how
individuals, collective actors and structures cope with the dilemmas, tensions
and ambivalences of modern societies embedded in supranational dynamics. This
interim meeting of RN 15 on global, transnational and cosmopolitan sociology
calls for papers dealing theoretically, methodologically and empirically with
issues related to the transnational dimension. We welcome all manner of papers
that deal with how the local, the transnational and the global are entwined and
construct the meaning of one another, and how individuals, organizations or
states manage this predicament for instance by emphasizing a cosmopolitan
outlook or by cherishing local culture. We also encourage papers that deal with
the current intensification of migration and asylum seeking in Europe from the
perspective of local-global entanglement.
Within the conference (programme), I will give the
following lecture.
Double Boundary and Cosmopolitan Experience in
Europe
Pierluca Birindelli
This
contribution aims to open up the debate about national, European and cosmopolitan identity through an interpretation of Simmel’s double boundary
dialectic: human beings are
boundaries and only those who stand outside their boundary can see it as such. One
of the difficulties of defining oneself as European stems from what could be
called the “double Other” (intra- and extra-European) diachronic recognition process.
Exploring the possible/impossible cosmopolitan meta-synthesis can identify certain
traits of the cosmopolitan experience in Europe. Furthermore, a critical
interpretation of the intellectual, aesthetic and romantic representation of a
“Europe without Europeans” suggests that travelling to or within the Old World
(North–South; East–West) does not necessarily mean crossing social and cultural
boundaries. Therefore the cosmopolitan globetrotter might not be the
best “broker of knowledge” in our globalized world. As for the mental life of
the metropolis represented by Simmel, in a G-world even socio-psychological
life might degenerate into a series of defensive mechanisms. The boundaries
could become the walls of an overinflated self: a social actor who fails to
mediate between objective and subjective culture. Clearly, a cosmopolitan
individual can cross national boundaries. Nevertheless, it is difficult to find
evidence of any real transcending of class barriers and physical rather than
mythical divisions. It would appear that, if and when
they do occur, transcultural travel experiences are not necessarily
trans-social.
Key words:
Boundary, Simmel, Europe, Cosmopolitan, Transcultural, Trans-social